
1
Great Books Discussion Questions
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
1. Aurelius mentions several times in the text that he is grateful for his upbringing, family, the gods
and friends. Why does he believe that gratitude is important in life? Do you agree with him;
why or why not?
2. Aurelius writes in Book One: “I received the idea of a polity in which there is the same law for
all, a polity administered with regard to equal rights and equal freedom of speech, and the idea
of a kingly government which respects most of all the freedom of the governed. . . .” Does this
remark remind you of the “Bill of Rights” in the Constitution? If so, how? How does this
quotation relate to the current political environment?
3. In Book Two, Marcus writes: “Since it is possible that thou mayest depart from life this very
moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly.” Do you believe this is good advice? Why
or why not? Hoe can we reconcile this advice with the fact that Aurelius wrote much of the
Meditations during a war that he fought (and led) against Rome’s enemies?
4. Aurelius posed several questions about the nature of time in the Meditations. In Book Two he
writes: “For the present is the same to all, though that which perishes is not the same; and so
that which is lost appears to be a mere moment. For a man cannot lose either the past or the
future: for what a man has not, how can anyone take this from him”? Does this seem to be
good advice? Why or why not? How is this similar to the teachings of other philosophers or
religious leaders?
5. In Book Three, Aurelius writes: “Never value anything as profitable to thyself which shall compel
thee to break thy promise, to lose thy self-respect, to hate any man, to suspect, to curse, to act
the hypocrite, to desire anything which needs walls and curtains; for he who has preferred to
everything his own intelligence and daemon and the worship of its excellence, acts no tragic
part, does not groan, will not need either solitude or much company; and what is chief of all, he
will live without either pursuing or flying from death; but whether for a longer or a shorter time
he shall have the soul inclosed in the body, he cares not at all: for even if he must depart
immediately, he will go as readily as if he were going to do anything else which can be done with
decency and order; taking care of this only all through life, that his thoughts turn not away from
anything which belongs to an intelligent animal and a member of a civil community.” These are
noble sentiments; do you believe it is possible to live them? Why or why not? Does it seem
possible that the leader of an Empire can live according to these dictates? Why or why not?
6. Aurelius writes about the desire for praise and glory in Book Four: “But perhaps the desire of the
thing called fame will torment thee.—See how soon everything is forgotten, and look at the
chaos of infinite time on each side of the present, and the emptiness of applause, and the
changeableness and want of judgment in those who pretend to give praise, and the narrowness
of the space within which it is circumscribed, and be quiet at last.” How is this sentiment
reconciled with the seeming need today for people to seek “fifteen minutes of fame”? What
does this say for a person who is constantly in need of attention and praise?
7. In Book Four, Aurelius writes: “He is an abscess on the universe who withdraws and separates
himself from the reason of our common nature through being displeased with the things which
happen, for the same nature produces this, and has produced thee too: he is a piece rent
asunder from the state, who tears his own soul from that of reasonable animals, which is one.”