
78 BIS Annual Economic Report 2025
markets by enabling the contingent execution of actions in terms of collateral
management, margining adjustments and delivery-versus-payment arrangements.
Core to this vision of the future is trust in money. The foundation of any monetary
arrangement is the ability to settle payments at par, ie at full value. Money is
information-insensitive in that agents use it with “no questions asked”, ie without due
diligence. In this way, money underpins coordination in the economy through
common knowledge of its value by all agents, just as a common language coordinates
social interactions. If this common knowledge fails, so does coordination, and the
monetary system becomes unmoored, with large societal costs. Common knowledge
of the value of money has a shorthand – the “singleness of money” – where money
can be issued by different banks and accepted by all without hesitation. It does this
because it is settled at par against a common safe asset (central bank reserves)
provided by the central bank, which has a mandate to act in the public interest.
In addition to singleness, practical considerations suggest two further tests for
viability as the backbone of the monetary system. One is elasticity, referring to money
being provided flexibly to meet the need for large-value payments in the economy,
so that obligations are discharged in a timely way without gridlock taking over.
2
The
other is the system’s integrity against financial crime and other illicit activity.
Modern real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems are the canonical example of
the need for elasticity. In a two-tier banking system, the central bank is ready to provide
reserves to financial institutions elastically at the policy rate against high-quality
collateral. When needed, the central bank can provide intraday settlement liquidity
so that transactions can be settled in real time. Banks, in turn, can decide how much
money (in the form of deposits) they want to provide to the real economy. Importantly,
in a two-tier banking system banks can issue money without full bank reserve
backing, whether in the form of gold or silver coins (as was the case in gold- or
silver-backed monetary regimes) or as bank reserves (as is the case in today’s fiat
currency regime). The sheer size of payment values in a modern economy means
that carting gold and silver coins, maintaining cash piles or retaining large holdings
of pre-funded accounts to discharge obligations are simply impractical – they would
be recipes for payment system gridlock.
Another concrete manifestation of elasticity is the banking system’s role in
creating money through lending activities, including overdrafts and lines of credit.
Through overdrafts, payments with values that exceed deposit balances can be made
at the payer’s discretion, while lines of credit provide liquidity on demand. This allows
complex interlocking obligations in the economy to be discharged in a timely manner.
The third test is that of the integrity of the monetary system against illicit activity.
This imperative flows from the recognition that a monetary system that is open to
widespread abuse from fraud, financial crime and other illicit activities will not
command trust from society or stand the test of time. Considerations of monetary
sovereignty (the ability of a jurisdiction to make decisions and exercise influence over
the monetary system within its borders) in the face of potential currency substitution
raise related issues.
Measured against the three tests, today’s two-tier monetary system, with the
central bank at its core, stands above other models in ensuring that money is fit for
purpose. Central banks provide the highest form of money, support settlement
finality and ensure stability and trust in the unit of account. Commercial banks and
other private sector entities provide crucial services to support economic activity
within and across borders, facilitating the means of payment that support economic
transactions. There is, no doubt, considerable room for improvement in the current
system. The vision outlined here gives a glimpse of what is possible. Nevertheless, the
merits of the core architecture of the system with the central bank at its centre should
be recognised and preserved.