The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton

The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton is a philosophical thriller that explores themes of order, chaos, and the nature of existence. The story follows Gabriel Syme, a poet who infiltrates a secret anarchist council in London, only to discover deeper truths about identity and authority. As Syme navigates a world filled with eccentric characters, including the enigmatic President Sunday, he grapples with moral dilemmas that challenge his understanding of good and evil. This novel is essential for readers interested in existential philosophy and the absurdity of modern life. Chesterton's wit and imagination make this work a captivating read for fans of classic literature and political intrigue.

Key Points

  • Explores the conflict between order and chaos through Gabriel Syme's journey.
  • Features a secret anarchist council with eccentric characters, including President Sunday.
  • Examines existential themes and moral dilemmas in a rapidly changing world.
  • Combines elements of mystery, adventure, and philosophical inquiry.
,
  • newtopiccyclegrowin
77
/ 109
Full Text Archive
https://www.fulltextarchive.com
The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton
A WILD, MAD, HILARIOUS AND PROFOUNDLY MOVING TALE
It is very difficult to classify THE MAN WHO WAS THURSDAY. It is possible to say that it is a
gripping adventure story of murderous criminals and brilliant policemen; but it was to be
expected that the author of the Father Brown stories should tell a detective story like no-one
else. On this level, therefore, THE MAN WHO WAS THURSDAY succeeds superbly; if nothing
else, it is a magnificent tour-de-force of suspense-writing.
However, the reader will soon discover that it is much more than that. Carried along on the
boisterous rush of the narrative by Chesterton's wonderful high-spirited style, he will soon see
that he is being carried into much deeper waters than he had planned on; and the totally
unforeseeable denouement will prove for the modern reader, as it has for thousands of others
since 1908 when the book was first published, an inevitable and moving experience, as the
investigators finally discover who Sunday is.
THE MAN WHO WAS THURSDAY
A NIGHTMARE
G. K. CHESTERTON
To Edmund Clerihew Bentley
1 / 109
Full Text Archive
https://www.fulltextarchive.com
A cloud was on the mind of men, and wailing went the weather, Yea, a sick cloud upon the soul
when we were boys together. Science announced nonentity and art admired decay; The world
was old and ended: but you and I were gay; Round us in antic order their crippled vices came--
Lust that had lost its laughter, fear that had lost its shame. Like the white lock of Whistler, that lit
our aimless gloom, Men showed their own white feather as proudly as a plume. Life was a fly
that faded, and death a drone that stung; The world was very old indeed when you and I were
young. They twisted even decent sin to shapes not to be named: Men were ashamed of honour;
but we were not ashamed. Weak if we were and foolish, not thus we failed, not thus; When that
black Baal blocked the heavens he had no hymns from us Children we were--our forts of sand
were even as weak as eve, High as they went we piled them up to break that bitter sea. Fools
as we were in motley, all jangling and absurd, When all church bells were silent our cap and
beds were heard.
Not all unhelped we held the fort, our tiny flags unfurled; Some giants laboured in that cloud to
lift it from the world. I find again the book we found, I feel the hour that flings Far out of fish-
shaped Paumanok some cry of cleaner things; And the Green Carnation withered, as in forest
fires that pass, Roared in the wind of all the world ten million leaves of grass; Or sane and
sweet and sudden as a bird sings in the rain-- Truth out of Tusitala spoke and pleasure out of
pain. Yea, cool and clear and sudden as a bird sings in the grey, Dunedin to Samoa spoke, and
darkness unto day. But we were young; we lived to see God break their bitter charms. God and
the good Republic come riding back in arms: We have seen the City of Mansoul, even as it
rocked, relieved-- Blessed are they who did not see, but being blind, believed.
This is a tale of those old fears, even of those emptied hells, And none but you shall understand
the true thing that it tells-- Of what colossal gods of shame could cow men and yet crash, Of
what huge devils hid the stars, yet fell at a pistol flash. The doubts that were so plain to chase,
so dreadful to withstand-- Oh, who shall understand but you; yea, who shall understand? The
doubts that drove us through the night as we two talked amain, And day had broken on the
streets e'er it broke upon the brain. Between us, by the peace of God, such truth can now be
told; Yea, there is strength in striking root and good in growing old. We have found common
things at last and marriage and a creed, And I may safely write it now, and you may safely read.
G. K. C.
CHAPTER I
THE TWO POETS OF SAFFRON PARK
THE suburb of Saffron Park lay on the sunset side of London, as red and ragged as a cloud of
sunset. It was built of a bright brick throughout; its sky-line was fantastic, and even its ground
plan was wild. It had been the outburst of a speculative builder, faintly tinged with art, who
called its architecture sometimes Elizabethan and sometimes Queen Anne, apparently under
the impression that the two sovereigns were identical. It was described with some justice as an
artistic colony, though it never in any definable way produced any art. But although its
pretensions to be an intellectual centre were a little vague, its pretensions to be a pleasant
place were quite indisputable. The stranger who looked for the first time at the quaint red
houses could only think how very oddly shaped the people must be who could fit in to them. Nor
when he met the people was he disappointed in this respect. The place was not only pleasant,
but perfect, if once he could regard it not as a deception but rather as a dream. Even if the
2 / 109
Full Text Archive
https://www.fulltextarchive.com
people were not "artists," the whole was nevertheless artistic. That young man with the long,
auburn hair and the impudent face--that young man was not really a poet; but surely he was a
poem. That old gentleman with the wild, white beard and the wild, white hat--that venerable
humbug was not really a philosopher; but at least he was the cause of philosophy in others.
That scientific gentleman with the bald, egg-like head and the bare, bird-like neck had no real
right to the airs of science that he assumed. He had not discovered anything new in biology; but
what biological creature could he have discovered more singular than himself? Thus, and thus
only, the whole place had properly to be regarded; it had to be considered not so much as a
workshop for artists, but as a frail but finished work of art. A man who stepped into its social
atmosphere felt as if he had stepped into a written comedy.
More especially this attractive unreality fell upon it about nightfall, when the extravagant roofs
were dark against the afterglow and the whole insane village seemed as separate as a drifting
cloud. This again was more strongly true of the many nights of local festivity, when the little
gardens were often illuminated, and the big Chinese lanterns glowed in the dwarfish trees like
some fierce and monstrous fruit. And this was strongest of all on one particular evening, still
vaguely remembered in the locality, of which the auburn-haired poet was the hero. It was not by
any means the only evening of which he was the hero. On many nights those passing by his
little back garden might hear his high, didactic voice laying down the law to men and particularly
to women. The attitude of women in such cases was indeed one of the paradoxes of the place.
Most of the women were of the kind vaguely called emancipated, and professed some protest
against male supremacy. Yet these new women would always pay to a man the extravagant
compliment which no ordinary woman ever pays to him, that of listening while he is talking. And
Mr. Lucian Gregory, the red-haired poet, was really (in some sense) a man worth listening to,
even if one only laughed at the end of it. He put the old cant of the lawlessness of art and the art
of lawlessness with a certain impudent freshness which gave at least a momentary pleasure. He
was helped in some degree by the arresting oddity of his appearance, which he worked, as the
phrase goes, for all it was worth. His dark red hair parted in the middle was literally like a
woman's, and curved into the slow curls of a virgin in a pre-Raphaelite picture. From within this
almost saintly oval, however, his face projected suddenly broad and brutal, the chin carried
forward with a look of cockney contempt. This combination at once tickled and terrified the
nerves of a neurotic population. He seemed like a walking blasphemy, a blend of the angel and
the ape.
This particular evening, if it is remembered for nothing else, will be remembered in that place for
its strange sunset. It looked like the end of the world. All the heaven seemed covered with a
quite vivid and palpable plumage; you could only say that the sky was full of feathers, and of
feathers that almost brushed the face. Across the great part of the dome they were grey, with
the strangest tints of violet and mauve and an unnatural pink or pale green; but towards the
west the whole grew past description, transparent and passionate, and the last red-hot plumes
of it covered up the sun like something too good to be seen. The whole was so close about the
earth, as to express nothing but a violent secrecy. The very empyrean seemed to be a secret. It
expressed that splendid smallness which is the soul of local patriotism. The very sky seemed
small.
I say that there are some inhabitants who may remember the evening if only by that oppressive
sky. There are others who may remember it because it marked the first appearance in the place
of the second poet of Saffron Park. For a long time the red-haired revolutionary had reigned
without a rival; it was upon the night of the sunset that his solitude suddenly ended. The new
3 / 109
/ 109
End of Document
77
You May Also Like

FAQs of The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton

What is the main plot of The Man Who Was Thursday?
The Man Who Was Thursday follows Gabriel Syme, a poet who is recruited to infiltrate a secret anarchist council in London. As he becomes entangled in their bizarre activities, he discovers that the council members are not what they seem. The story unfolds with twists and turns, revealing deeper philosophical questions about identity, authority, and the nature of good and evil. Ultimately, Syme's journey leads him to confront the enigmatic figure of President Sunday, challenging his beliefs about order and chaos.
Who are the key characters in The Man Who Was Thursday?
Key characters in The Man Who Was Thursday include Gabriel Syme, the protagonist and poet who infiltrates the anarchist council. President Sunday is the mysterious leader of the council, embodying the themes of chaos and authority. Other notable characters include Lucian Gregory, the anarchist poet, and the other members of the council, each representing different philosophical perspectives. Together, they create a dynamic interplay of ideas and conflicts that drive the narrative forward.
What themes are explored in The Man Who Was Thursday?
The Man Who Was Thursday explores several themes, including the conflict between order and chaos, the nature of identity, and the philosophical questions surrounding good and evil. Chesterton delves into the absurdity of modern life and the complexities of human existence through the interactions of Syme and the anarchist council. The novel also examines the idea of duality, as characters often embody conflicting traits, challenging the reader's perceptions of morality and authority.
How does the novel address the concept of anarchy?
In The Man Who Was Thursday, anarchy is portrayed as both a philosophical idea and a practical threat. The anarchist council, led by President Sunday, represents a chaotic force that challenges societal norms and authority. However, as Syme infiltrates the council, the narrative reveals the absurdity and contradictions within anarchist ideology. Chesterton uses the characters' interactions to question the viability of anarchy as a solution to societal issues, ultimately suggesting that true order must be rooted in moral integrity.

Related of The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton