Modifying the Mini Cog for Cognitive Impairment Screening

Modifying the Mini Cog for Cognitive Impairment Screening

Modifying the Mini Cog focuses on adapting cognitive screening tools for non-literate individuals. The study introduces two alternative tasks to replace the Clock-Drawing Test, which is often unsuitable for those lacking literacy skills. Researchers evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of these modifications among older adults with varying cognitive impairments. The findings suggest that the modified Mini Cog versions can effectively screen for cognitive impairment in diverse populations. This research is valuable for healthcare providers and researchers working with non-literate groups, aiming to improve dementia detection methods.

Key Points

  • Introduces two alternative tasks for the Mini Cog to aid non-literate individuals in cognitive screening.
  • Evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of modified Mini Cog versions among older adults.
  • Correlates modified Mini Cog results with the Dementia Severity Rating Scale for validation.
  • Highlights the importance of adapting cognitive tests for diverse literacy levels in healthcare.
158
/ 11
Page 1/11
Modifying the Mini Cog to Screen for Cognitive
Impairment in Non-literate Individuals
Shambhu Prasad Adhikari ( spsaur@gmail.com )
Kathmandu University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-6844
Rubee Dev
University of Alberta
Soo Borson
University of Washington Seattle Campus: University of Washington
Research
Keywords: Acceptability and feasibility, dementia and cognitive impairment, literacy, Modied Mini-Cog
Posted Date: March 2nd, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-248870/v1
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  Read Full
License
Page 2/11
Abstract
Objectives: The Mini-Cog, a rapid, valid, and reliable screening tool for cognitive impairment, consists of 3-word
recall and an executive Clock-Drawing Test (CDT).However, CDT requires at least basic literacy and cultural
exposure to analog clocks, conditions not met in many population groups around the world. We developed a
modication of the Mini-Cog (MMC) for use with non-literate and literate individuals.
Methods: Participants were adults ( 60 years) with no neurological diagnosis, with known cognitive impairment
due to stroke, Parkinsonism, traumatic brain injury or Alzheimers disease, and whose family members were able
to read and write. We replaced the CDT with two tasks of everyday life: a serial subtraction task or a multistep
performance task. Family members rated the acceptability and feasibility of the Mini-Cog versions using a 6-
point scale, and completed a proxy-rated cognitive staging tool, the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS).
Spearmans rho, Mann- Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to evaluate group differences and associations
between measures.
Results: Data were collected from 63 participants (75% 60 years, 67% non-literate). Literacy was associated
with CDT (Chi-square strength 0.9, p < 0.001).Both MMC versions correlated with DSRS in healthy adults and
patients (rho 0.6-0.7, p < 0.05). In literate individuals, the acceptability and feasibility of CDT and both alternate
distractors were similarly high (5/6).
Conclusions:Two alternate distractor tasks may successfully replace CDT in the Mini-Cog. The MMC versions
are promising and deserve further study as screening tools for cognitive impairment in larger and more fully
characterized samples.
Background
The Mini-Cog (MC) is a short screening tool for clinically important cognitive impairment, originally developed by
Borson et al., in 2000 by combining a short memory test and an executive clock-drawing test (CDT) (1). The
choice of 3-item recall as the memory test was based on research showing that this element in the Mini Mental
State Examination (MMSE) is the rst to be impaired in early Alzheimer's disease (1, 2). The CDT serves as an
informative distractor: it creates a short recall delay and itself functions as a cognitive test, since it relies on
multiple integrated cognitive functions commonly impaired in neurocognitive disorders. The MC is feasible,
reliable, valid and time saving for settings in which rapid detection of cognitive impairment is desirable, since it
takes just 3 minutes to administer (1, 3). It has acceptable sensitivity and specicity for dementia in both clinical
and population samples, detects mild cognitive impairment (with less sensitivity and specicity), and has been
widely implemented in western clinical settings (1, 2, 4). McCarten and colleagues highlighted its speed and high
acceptance by older veterans (5). Studies have also reported superior screening properties of the MC compared
to that of MMSE (1, 6) and its psychometric properties have been well established (1, 7). Both components of the
MC contribute to detection of dementia (2).
The Mini-Cog is available in many languages (mini-cog.com) and has been used successfully in the United
States with both English and non-English speakers with varying levels of education, but its clock drawing
component is vulnerable to very low education – uncommon in US-born populations and poorly represented in
most research on cognitive impairment. The CDT may not be valid with non-literate individuals, as it generally
requires at least a basic education (typically 4–5 years of primary schooling); while oral 3-word recall should not
Page 3/11
be inuenced by literacy, clock drawing errors are common and often different in character among individuals
with fewer than 5 years of education, obscuring its discriminative power for acquired cognitive impairment (8).
To make a MC-like tool feasible for rapid screening of non-literate individuals for cognitive impairment, the CDT
must be replaced by another task that serves a similar function. Other screening tests such as the MMSE have
been modied for different levels of education (9) but not for non-literate individuals. In the Bangala version of
the MMSE, validated in both literate and non-literate groups, Kabir et al. replaced its calculation item with a real-
life mathematical calculation task used every day by both literate and non-literate individuals (10). This type of
real life task could also potentially replace the CDT, but because a small percentage of non-literate individuals
may not be able to do it, we introduced a multistep matching performance task as another option, reasoning
from the multistep command used in the MMSE (9). We created two modied versions of the Mini Cog (MMC),
one using an everyday serial subtraction task (SST) and the other a multistep performance task (MPT) in place
of CDT (Appendix 1).
Methods
Setting and Participants
Nepali-speaking individuals were recruited among patients and family members seen in a community hospital in
Nepal. Purposive sampling was used to identify potential participants for screening test comparisons. Inclusion
criteria generated two groups: older adults ( 60 years) with no diagnosis of neurological disease and
individuals of any age with diagnosis of a neurological disease (stroke, Parkinsons disease, traumatic brain
injury or Alzheimer’s disease) based on medical records. All had to be able to understand Nepali language and
respond orally to interview questions, and have a participating family member who could read and write.
Unconscious or medically unstable patients and individuals with conrmed primary psychiatric illness were
excluded.
Literacy was dened pragmatically for this project. Participants were rst asked if they were able to write and
read (yes/no), then to read a word from the 3-word registration task. They were then offered paper and pencil
and invited to write anything they liked. Those answering 'no' and demonstrably unable to read or write were
classied as non-literate, and presumed unable to do clock drawing.
Measures
Mini-Cog versions
:
Literate participants completed the original MC and both versions of MMC in random order. Non-literate
participants were not asked to do the MC, which requires drawing a clock, but completed both versions of MMC.
Measure feasibility and acceptability using questionnaires
:
Participants rated each component of the MC and the two MMC versions (3-word registration, 3 questions; each
distractor, 3 questions) using a 6-point scale developed for this study (Appendix 2). Each question was scored
/ 11
End of Document
158
You May Also Like

FAQs of Modifying the Mini Cog for Cognitive Impairment Screening

What are the main modifications made to the Mini Cog?
The main modifications to the Mini Cog involve replacing the Clock-Drawing Test with two alternative tasks: a Serial Subtraction Task (SST) and a Multistep Performance Task (MPT). These tasks are designed to be more accessible for non-literate individuals, allowing them to demonstrate cognitive function without requiring literacy skills. The SST involves simple arithmetic, while the MPT includes everyday actions that can be performed without reading or writing. Both tasks aim to maintain the original tool's effectiveness in screening for cognitive impairment.
How was the acceptability of the modified Mini Cog assessed?
Acceptability of the modified Mini Cog was assessed through participant ratings using a 6-point scale. Family members of the participants provided feedback on the feasibility and applicability of the SST and MPT. The study found that both alternative tasks received high acceptability ratings from participants, indicating that they were viewed as suitable replacements for the Clock-Drawing Test. This feedback is crucial for ensuring that cognitive screening tools are effective and user-friendly for diverse populations.
What population was targeted in this study?
The study targeted Nepali-speaking individuals aged 60 and above, including those with and without neurological diagnoses. Participants were recruited from a community hospital in Nepal, focusing on older adults who may experience cognitive impairment due to conditions like Alzheimer's disease, stroke, or traumatic brain injury. The inclusion of both literate and non-literate individuals allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of the modified Mini Cog's effectiveness across different literacy levels. This focus on a specific demographic highlights the need for culturally and contextually relevant cognitive screening tools.
What were the findings regarding the correlation of the modified Mini Cog with cognitive impairment?
The findings indicated that both modified versions of the Mini Cog, the SST and MPT, showed significant correlations with the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS). This suggests that the modified tools are effective in identifying cognitive impairment among participants, regardless of their literacy levels. The study's results provide preliminary evidence that these alternative tasks can serve as valid screening methods for dementia, thereby enhancing the detection capabilities in populations where traditional methods may fail.
What implications do the study's findings have for cognitive screening?
The study's findings have significant implications for cognitive screening practices, particularly in regions with high illiteracy rates. By demonstrating that the modified Mini Cog can effectively screen for cognitive impairment in non-literate populations, healthcare providers can improve early detection of dementia and related conditions. This adaptation of cognitive assessment tools can lead to better patient outcomes by facilitating timely interventions and support. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the importance of culturally sensitive approaches in healthcare, ensuring that all individuals have access to appropriate cognitive evaluations.

Related of Modifying the Mini Cog for Cognitive Impairment Screening